Remember how harper got his team of nit-wits, thieves and sexual basket-cases to guffaw at his jokes about ISIS/ISIL's lawyers going after us for violating international law? (In response to a question from Thomas Mulcair about whether we'd explained our position on why we were supposedly justified in militarily attacking targets in Syria to the UN?) Haw-haw-haw!
Then harper turned around and went and asked the UN for permission (sort of).
That's why Mulcair called harper's answer "idiotic" at the time.
In other news, I tried to watch "Greenberg" last night.
I'd heard good things about it. It was about a crotchety misanthropic mentally unstable dude who ends up hanging-out with a younger crowd. Which is something I did. Obviously, the 40-something male lead will get the 20-something female love-interest. Then again, I was the 36-year old who got the 21-year old girlfriend.
But I found it implausible that a young woman would let a middle-aged guy start eating her out within minutes of being in her apartment. Even if she'd just come off a long-term relationship.
Especially if he was the brother of the father of the family she baby-sits for. Especially if she knew he'd just left a psychiatric institution. Especially if she knew he had nowhere else to live but his brother's house and was behaving like a leech.
I just couldn't get past that implausibility.
Then harper turned around and went and asked the UN for permission (sort of).
That's why Mulcair called harper's answer "idiotic" at the time.
In other news, I tried to watch "Greenberg" last night.
But I found it implausible that a young woman would let a middle-aged guy start eating her out within minutes of being in her apartment. Even if she'd just come off a long-term relationship.
Especially if he was the brother of the father of the family she baby-sits for. Especially if she knew he'd just left a psychiatric institution. Especially if she knew he had nowhere else to live but his brother's house and was behaving like a leech.
I just couldn't get past that implausibility.
No comments:
Post a Comment