Apparently, Ms. Clinton called WikiLeaks' revelation of US diplomatic shenanigans "an attack on the international community." Seriously. The USA spies on the UN Secretary General, launches illegal wars, and somebody exposing their crimes is the "aggressor"?
Go back to lying to the 'hard-working white people" you courted whilst competing with Obama for the job of Sell-out to Wall Street-in-Chief and spare us all your self-pitying, hypocritical whining.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4 comments:
It's the same tactic as usual: do everything to keep the spotlight on the leaker, so that the subservient mainstream/corporate media pays no attention to the actual contents of the leaks ...
What Ms. Clinton actually meant was that this is "an attack on the US backed dictators throughout the world."
As an added bonus, Wikileaks included the Ruling Class's true thoughts on Democracy, rule of law, and Civil Rights
1) on Democracy - snivelling mobs
2) on Rule of Law - something to be co-opted
3) on Civil Rights - to be ignored. - No court ever inforces a sanction on the decision makers
Hey Mentarch! Good to see you!
And you're right. This knee-jerk attacking on the messengers, this drivel about the "dangers" of exposing these secrets ... it's so transparently obvious and hypocritical.
Anonymous,
1, 2, and 3, ... that's them all right. Since there's no accountability, since they've completely untouchable, it works for them so far, why should they stop?
Thwap -
Why should they? Because as Gollum found out, the light burns ...
BemusedLurker (missed the tag on the first)
Post a Comment