Wednesday, August 17, 2011

Socialist Ducks

This essay was penned by Brian LaBreton. It was the winning entry into the Fraiser Institute's "Future 'Conservative' Hacks of Canada" contest. Brian is a second-year university student, studying economics. His parents are both high-school teachers and he hates them deeply. He also had the misfortune to read Atlas Shrugged last summer.

When I was in high school I used to go down to the lake every morning and bring a bag of bread to feed the ducks. I found these creatures fascinating and they seemed so happy to see me in the morning.

But then one day I noticed that there were far more ducks than there had been when I'd first started feeding them. And I noticed that they were pushing each other and fighting for the pieces of bread like a disgusting swarm of insects rather than like cute little ducks. And it occurred to me that they were forgetting how to fend for themselves.

In short, I was creating welfare dependency among my town's duck population!

That's how it is with people as it is with all God's other creatures. We all want to do things the easiest way. So when a friendly human gives out free bread, the ducks come running. And when a bleeding-heart government hands out free money, people quit their jobs and make the rational choice to live off welfare instead.

I decided that it was essential for me to provide some "tough love" (tough CAPITALIST love) to my ducks.

Now, other hacks before me have written about simply cutting-off the free food supply. But I'm a passionate believer in free markets and property rights. I wasn't just going to abruptly cut off the bread. If I was going to turn these socialist ducks into entrepreneurial ducks, I was going to have to go much father.

Now, ducks like to eat plants that grow on, or near the water. So what I did was to construct a pattern of nets blocking the ducks from any of their local food sources. It was my intention to make them do little tricks and things for my amusement, in order to earn access to food. (Have you ever read "The Tragedy of the Commons"? If not, then I suggest that you do so.) Then, to my dismay, I noticed that ducks could fly. Prevented from feeding at their nesting grounds, the ducks simply flew to another part of the lake.

Now, I'm a big believer in corporate free trade deals that allow capital to move freely to where the opportunities are but which prevent workers from doing so. Undaunted by the cagey tactics of the ducks, I purchased more netting (I got the money to by the netting and the rigging from a wealthy crackpot who lives nearby.) I netted the whole area around the nesting ground so that the ducks would not be able to "illegally immigrate" to un-netted areas of the lake.

Now my plan was ready. The eager ducks all lined up, desperate for food to feed themselves and their ducklings. Instead of a chaotic pushing and shoving for food, using a combination of kind words and stick blows, I was able to force them to line up in an orderly fashion and make a few cute little quacks before opening a portion of the netting and allowing them access to their food. As an economist (in training) I'm also a scientist, and therefore, a firm believer in the survival of the fittest. I decided to apply my own subjective values to the ducks and decided to reward the biggest, handsomest, loudest quacking ducks, by letting them feed more than the smaller, homelier, lazier ducks.

For half the summer I conducted my little experiment and things were going excellently. The ducks were turning into a disciplined workforce and the weak, unable to compete, were dying off. If only I could have found some way to make the ducks make money for me, I would have been a true capitalist. Alas, nobody in my town wanted to buy any of our local wild duck population (I should think about privatizing the lake and charging people access to the waterfront, then, perhaps, when viewing the cute ducks isn't free any more, they'd change their tune!) and they had no really marketable skills. So, in this case, turning these socialist, dependent ducks into industrious, self-supporting, capitalist system ducks would have to be its own reward.

Then, sadly, having privatized their food supply, and limited their freedom, I got bored after a while, and decided that there were better avenues for my intelligence and talent and resources (my "capital") and I took up another hobby.

And I forgot about the ducks and they all starved to death.

But I'll bet they're the most entrepreneurial ducks in duck heaven!

Because, like most nincompoops, our budding ideological hack has an incoherent faith in a religion that purports to condemn the ability of the wealthy from getting into heaven.
Link

13 comments:

Anonymous said...

He hates his parent? Awww, did daddy not hug you enough or did midnight creeping uncle show you some alternative life-style choices? A little late night Svend loving?

b_nichol said...

This is hilarious!
If he hadn't passed away 2 years ago, I would swear that this had Jon Swift's fingerprints all over it.

thwap said...

Anonymous,

You're either pretending to be that stupid to prove a stupid point, or you're really incoherently STOOOPID.

In case it's the latter, ... the person you're making fun of doesn't exist, but is a caricature of a "conservative."

I'm pretty sure you're just pretending to be that stupid, but I can't for the life of me understand what you're trying to accomplish.

Whoever you are, any anonymous comments with homophobic references will be deleted from here on in.

b_nichol,

Glad you liked it. It's based on an actual essay that was written in the Fraser Institute's youth indoctrination forum back in the nineties.

An alternative ending would be that he found a more lucrative market for the lake's plant matter than his free-loading ducks and sold it elsewhere, but the grim ending would be exactly the same.

Anyway, just something I typed in lieu of having anything worthwhile and detailed on any of today's present crises.

Anonymous said...

Reads more like a socialist utopia...centralized planning, politically motivated famines, strict controls on internal migration...

thwap said...

Anonymous,

Fair enough. Except that it's also a good description of top-down, capitalist social-engineering. Which is a devastatingly real problem.

Anonymous said...

Actually, the silly one is you. As a leftwinger you know it is turn. You rant and you rage and you go no where. Hey, did Homes not bombs return your calls yet? BWT don't you want social-engineering? Don't want the power to tell others how to live their lives like every good pinko? Don't worry, ain't gonna happen here, but keep on trucking anyway.

thwap said...

Anonymous,

You're a coward for refusing to face the truth about your own hobby-horses.

But cowardice and denial are par for the course with your ilk.

Anonymous said...

What are my hobby-horses? Please tell me. Pissing-off tiny leftwingers is one? But what are the others? Actually, I don't think you are coward, not that it will do you any good mind you. Still homes not bombs call back yet?

thwap said...

Anonymous,

I'm going to assume that you're the anonymous who hates leftists and socialists, and that, therefore, your hobbyhorse is right-wing politics including capitalism.

That's your hobby-horse.

And it's a failure.

The only question is will it preserve itself by reverting society to fascism, splitting the majority against itself with racism and nationalism and installing a stupid, thuggish militarism, or whether socialism will finally win and usher in a democratic paradise on earth.

Anonymous said...

Socialism win? LOL, thats a good one! Heck, the media is declearing the dips-shits dead when their leader dies, and we all know what he really has. Capitalism is not perfect, but it is way better than depresssing, uninteresting waste that is socialism. Oh, I am poor and stupid that means I should, nay must, get the same as the smart and hard working. No thanks. The poor, lazy, and stupid can die in the street or kill themselves, which ever is cheapest and less fuss.

Most socialist should take the same advice too, but hey at least you believe in baby killing, so you don't breed much.

thwap said...

Keep raving.

Capitalism has failed. Since the 1980s, the world has been following your neo-liberal, deregulatory, "free trade" bullshit and the world economy has crashed and burned.

Because "the brightest and the best" turned out to be a bunch of criminal shit-heads.

You can't sell stuff without there being people who can afford them. But capitalism can't allow people to have the money to afford stuff, because then people will be confident and strong enough to demand justice.

The financialization of the economy since the 1970s was the direct result of this process.

Your system is unsustainable and self-destructive. Your devotion to it is evidence of profound ignorance and numerous mental and moral deficiencies.

Anonymous said...

You can't sell stuff without there being people who can afford them.

When Ford first started making automobiles, he made sure to pay his workers good wages. Out of the pure goodness of his heart? Of course not. He wanted to make sure that there'd be a market full of people able to purchase the cars he was selling.

Instead of enlightened self-interest, we now have globalization, rampant corporatism, and big piles of cash just sitting around in corp bank acccounts. Big piles of semi-useless cash is a bad thing for capitalism.

thwap said...

He also had a labour-turnover rate of over 300%.

People hated working at Ford.

Anyway, Ford didn't significantly increase the living standards of the working class. Inequality increased in the first decades of Fordism.

It was that inequality that spurred the speculation that produced the 1929 New York Stock Exchange Crash.