So, the party that screamed blue murder about "illegal polls" in Etobicoke-Centre and in Guelph, and which (shamefully with the NDP) was having hysterics about veiled Muslim women voting (although people voting through the mail from overseas somehow never appeared on their radar), has now argued, before the Supreme Court of Canada, that simple "clerical errors" shouldn't invalidate an election??
I'm shocked and appalled that this flea-bitten rat Opitz even got an appeal after the devastating critique of the shoddy election monitoring by Elections Canada.by Justice Lederer. I'm now filled with misgiving that the Court is even bothering to mull over the witless argument barfed up by Opitz's lawyers.
In brief, the Optiz team is arguing that just because a bunch of incredibly sloppy mistakes were made in an election that was won by 26 votes out of 56,523 votes, is no reason to have a new election!
Funny that. So, if a teacher adds up the marks wrong on a test, that's no reason to change the results? So if a bunch of people vote and there's no paperwork, that's fine? It's amazing how these pieces-of-shit operate.
2 comments:
I totally agree, thwap.
I am convinced that the CPC ensured Opitz' victory with one strategy or another. I'm convinced of it in all those close CPC victories where long-standing incumbents were suddenly ousted with less than 1000 votes. Especially LPC incumbents that managed to hang on to their seats during the height of the AdScam backlash.
The last election had absolutely no look or feel of voter backlash - just apathy. Even the media pundits were calling for a third minority.
B.Y.
Nothing got eaten evidently. ;)
Anyhow, ... yeah, considering all the rest of the criminality the harpercons engaged in, it's the height of absurdity for them to profess wounded innocence when people speculate about what else they did.
They have to be defeated and punished or this country is finished.
Post a Comment