Friday, June 7, 2024

Armageddon and Antony Blinken

 


Recently I wrote a couple of posts about Antony Blinken's performance of "Rockin' in the Free World" in Kiev.  I argued that no matter which way you looked at it, said performance was indicative of crippling stupidity on Blinken's part.  I wrote those posts, not because I wanted to make fun of Blinken and feel superior to him.  I wrote them because Blinken is the US Secretary of State and is therefore a very powerful man.  And if we want to understand why the world is the way that it is and if we want to anticipate where the world will go as people like Blinken respond to subsequent events, it is imperative that we acknowledge the incredibly low level at which these freaks are operating.

I mean, to begin with, the proxy-war against Russia that the Ukrainians are being used for, and the genocidal Zionist campaign against the Palestinians are stupid, evil policies.  They are stupid and evil and sick and deranged because we live inside a sick system that rewards sick behaviour driven by sick, shallow, stupid people's twisted, narcissistic, sociopathic desires.  So, war with Ukraine, genocide in Palestine, neo-liberal economics, saber-rattling against China, fossil fuels expansion, micro-plastics, price-gouging, police brutality, mass media corruption, etc., ... they're all part of a system built for and maintained by sick, psychopathic imbeciles such as Antony Blinken.

Look out! He's going to shart!

And that is how we find ourselves in situations like this:

It’s damn near impossible to keep up with all the warmongering of the western empire these days.


In response to the frightening steps that NATO has been taking to allow western-supplied weapons to be used by Ukraine to strike Russian territory, Vladimir Putin warned last week that these escalations can lead to “serious consequences”. 

“This constant escalation can lead to serious consequences,” Putin said. “If these serious consequences occur in Europe, how will the US behave, bearing in mind our parity in the field of strategic weapons? Hard to say. Do they want global conflict?”

...


On Friday, NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg dismissed Putin’s warnings, saying, “This is nothing new. It has … been the case for a long time that every time NATO allies are providing support to Ukraine, President Putin is trying to threaten us to not do that.”


This cavalier attitude toward nuclear brinkmanship that empire managers have been demonstrating lately was addressed on Monday by Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergey Ryabkov, who said the US is close to making a “fatal” miscalculation. 


“I would like to caution American officials against miscalculations which may have fatal consequences. For some unknown reason, they underestimate the seriousness of the rebuff they may receive,” Ryabkov reportedly said.

...


It’s important to push back against brinkmanship with Russia well before we go over the brink into nuclear war, because obviously by then it’s too late for anyone to do anything — and indeed a full-scale nuclear war between NATO and the Russian Federation could mean that nobody will ever do anything ever again. Nuclear armageddon is the one foreign policy mistake that you can’t course-correct for after you make it, so it’s extremely urgent to course-correct long before we get to that point.


The biggest risk for nuclear war isn’t that either side will knowingly choose to enter into one, but that one will be set off by miscalculation, miscommunication or technical malfunction in the chaos and confusion of soaring tensions, as nearly happened numerous times during the last cold war. The higher tensions get, the more likely such an incident becomes, and the more hair-trigger everyone’s nuclear systems will be. 

And that's the reason why I'm pointing out Blinken's enormous stupidity.  It's not just "trash talking."  Stupid people like Blinken, with their stupid beliefs and their stupid values and their stupid policies might get us all killed.  There's a tendency to see powerful people in positions of global importance as being overall intelligent people who know that they're lying and who know how hypocritical and cynical their professions of "values" are.  Some people like to see individuals like Blinken, the Clintons, Bezos, Gates, Jamie Dimon Crystia Freeland, stephen harper, ad nauseum, as basically smart, and I'm occasionally chided for underestimating them.

But I don't think that other way of looking at them provides as good an explanation for their behaviour as my way does.  I think looking at these people as the idiots that they are will help clarify how we find ourselves in the nightmare that we're in and will more effectively predict the actions of these scumbags.   (I'm reminded again of stephen "smartest man in the room" harper and the way he would crumble and then flee the country whenever his shameless, brazen lying met with the slightest challenge.)

No my friends; We live in a world of idiots.  Stupid people who come by their stupidity honestly.  They were born with it.  And they're supported by vast armies of stupid people.  From partisan hacks like the former blogger Montreal Simon (and his supervisor the detestable Jackie Blue) to the deluded, hypocritical ass-hats at Daily Kos supporting the "liberal" wing of the oligarchy, to the shit-heads in the working class who support "conservative" grifter parties led by Doug Ford, stephen harper, Poilievre, Trump, Mitch McConnell.

And, working together, they'll probably get us all killed.




6 comments:

zoombats said...

Stupid people are so stupid they don't even know their stupid or he's so stupid he thinks I'm stupid. These are just sayings that have gained some traction as humour with a ring of truth. Satire. In all seriousness the cynic in me precludes that we have all been duped by idiots our entire lives. They have made us insecure in our own values by impressing us with their incompetence. The kid in High school voted most likely to succeed only to become the town cop. Harper hiding in a closet when a perpetrator entered the Capital. M. Simon has retreated because his "Boy" has failed. After reading your post I reflected on your analogy of our state and stumbled upon a interesting point known as the "Dunning Kruger effect". If you haven't heard of it you will be enlightened. I have always wrestled with the question of I'm either stupidest person in the room or the smartest. I haven't figured it out yet.

thwap said...

zoombats,

I don't know about you, but I don't think I'm the smartest person in the room. I know my limitations. The reason I am so harshly critical of the abilities of people like Blinken, harper, etc., is because they deserve it. Thinking that they're idiots and that I'm smarter than they are doesn't mean that I think I'm a genius.

I've heard of Dunning Kruger and I try to see if I'm ever behaving like a victim of that effect.

But when you look at the stupid things that someone like Antony Blinken says (Iran threatening the stability in the Middle East/Asking China to help defeat Russia [so that China can thereby isolate itself and become easier prey for the USA]/Singing "Rockin' in the Free World" in Kiev for whatever reason) there is no other option but to declare the man stupid and deluded.

Then you wonder about a system that allows such a mediocrity to reach such a position of power and you go on from there.

Purple library guy said...

Too much of what passes for responses to Putin in the West come down to "He's bluffing". The problem is, Putin is not prone to bluffing. His way of operating seems much more like "Establish a track record of saying what you are going to do and then doing it, so people take you seriously". So for instance, they said he was bluffing when he said if there was no diplomatic solution on offer to the issues around Ukraine, he would have to use "military-technical" measures. Maybe it's just me, but I think there are some military-technical measures happening.

Which would be a good strategy if the people he was dealing with paid attention to reality. I think it may be one of Putin's few serious weaknesses at foreign policy that he seems to have a hard time grappling with the fact that his opposite numbers are as detached from reality outside of their bubbles as they are. (Note: There is a LOT I dislike about Putin's domestic policy, but given his objectives as I understand them, he is generally very effective at foreign policy)

Of course to some extent, his foreign policy approach is like an internet argument. Often in an internet argument, the point is not to convince the other person. Their position is entrenched, they might even be a paid shill. The point is the people watching the argument, who you want to end up thinking you made more sense than the other person did. He's not trying to successfully negotiate with the West, he's trying to perform such negotiation for the rest of the international audience so they end up thinking "He did what he could, he tried to use the system as it's meant to work, and if that was useless for a member of the Security Council then how useless would it be for us? Maybe there's something to this 'multipolar world' idea."

But that doesn't really apply to escalation threats. And if Putin underestimates how bullheaded the other people can be, how much they can ignore the prospect of mass death because they don't want to believe in it, he could end up triggering the end times by his blind assumption that rationality has to take effect sometime as much as the morons do by ignoring the danger.

zoombats said...

Yeah, I was joking about smartest in the room. It has been said that if you are smartest in the room you're in the wrong room.I am in awe though of just how stupid people are. I continue to view anybody who stands by Israel during these times to be either incredibly stupid or just insane. The system is a "wonder" isn't it

thwap said...

zoombats,

I might as well reply with the latest column from Caitlin Johnstone that I just read.

"When so many mainstream consensus positions fail to get the most basic and obvious moral positions right, and not only fail to get them right but get them completely ass backwards, you are living in a civilization that has gone bat shit crazy.

Our civilization is crazy because the systems which govern it are crazy, and they have to drive all of us crazy to get us to consent to those systems."


https://caitlinjohnstone.com.au/2024/06/07/when-opposing-a-genocide-means-youre-a-nazi/


(In case I screw-up the html.)

thwap said...

Purple library guy,

The way you describe it makes our current situation even more terrifying.

The USA/NATO behaviour you describe is that of a bully who doesn't care about consequences, who doesn't care about looking like the bad guy, because they think their target is weak and will either accept humiliation or getting their ass kicked.

But as we've been seeing, the bully USA is actually a dying empire. They're behaving this way both out of hubris (the post-Cold War mentality that led to the Gulf War and then the Invasion of Iraq) as well as out of confused fear at the rise of China and the re-emergence of Russia and the dying of the economy.

And Putin's Russia is a target for the bully-USA that could actually destroy civilization if it comes down to it.

Putin has no intention of having himself and Russia go the way of Gaddafi and Libya and so he's obligated to resist.